Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
‘Military-Style’ Firearms Aren’t Protected By Second Amendment, Court Rules
#46
(02-25-2017, 11:19 AM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Let's keep it simple. An AR is a rifle, correct? And M855 is a rifle round, correct?  And now you're disputing its stopping power which you claimed earlier was indisputable.

Nope, only disputing it's suitability as a home defense round compared to other, far more suitable, choices.

Quote:Would you care to explain why M855 would be a poor choice?

You mean compared to a JHP, fragmenting or other pre-stressed jacketed round that's designed to dump kinetic energy into a target and not over penetrate?  You're being so fond of fire arms related pedantry I'm shocked you haven't already told the class.  Maybe you can then explain why an indoor range won't allow their use?





Messages In This Thread
RE: ‘Military-Style’ Firearms Aren’t Protected By Second Amendment, Court Rules - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 02-25-2017, 02:18 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)