02-25-2017, 02:41 PM
(02-25-2017, 02:18 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Nope, only disputing it's suitability as a home defense round compared to other, far more suitable, choices.
You mean compared to a JHP, fragmenting or other pre-stressed jacketed round that's designed to dump kinetic energy into a target and not over penetrate? You're being so fond of fire arms related pedantry I'm shocked you haven't already told the class. Maybe you can then explain why an indoor range won't allow their use?
Is that a yes or a no? Would you like to explain why M855 is a poor choice or not? And why would you compare one rifle round to another rifle round when claiming the stopping power of a rifle compared to a handgun is indisputable in a home defense scenario?
Is it because you might get a through and through wound with the rifle when shooting someone less than 20' away and a handgun or a shotgun might be a more suitable choice in that scenario? There are many different opinions. It's far from indisputable.
