Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
‘Military-Style’ Firearms Aren’t Protected By Second Amendment, Court Rules
#55
(02-25-2017, 11:45 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: I haven't seen a single person mention this yet... aside from home defense/self defense, I also just simply enjoy shooting for hobby/leisure.

There's a lot of hobbies I don't understand that other people enjoy. I don't understand people who collect or work on cars and make them all super powered and shit. Cars are hella dangerous, but I don't feel the need to try to remove their enjoyment from their life, and their hobby doesn't even have the added potential to save their life.

Even if you ban guns/gun types from the law abiding folk, it won't make the criminals less criminal. Just hypocritical people who don't know what they're talking about making laws about things they don't know about. As if they aren't constantly being protected by people with guns.

I've made the comparison of high-performance vehicles to high-performance weapons plenty; most cannot (or more likely will not) understand the analogy.

I too like to shot as a hobby; however, I still advocate that you should be trained and licensed prior to doing so. 
[Image: bfine-guns2.png]

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]





Messages In This Thread
RE: ‘Military-Style’ Firearms Aren’t Protected By Second Amendment, Court Rules - bfine32 - 02-26-2017, 01:13 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)