Jeff sessions didnt disclose russian meetings

[*bfine32*]

(03-02-2017, 08:10 PM)hollodero Wrote: Wow, a mind has to be really open to see things that way.

When someone says I didn't communicate with the Russians - and then it turns out he did - and somehow an open mind should assume he meant "not as member of the campaign" or "not in the context of election fraud" when he clearly did not add anything of that kind to his statement - that is rich.

I always try to keep it fair as long as I can. But that goes a bit too far. The question doesn't even matter, he could have been asked if he found Sarah Silverman attractive or what's his opinion on onion soup. As soon as he said "I did not have communications with the Russians" it can only mean he didn't have communications with the Russians, or else it's not a true statement by any stretch.

"Rich" as it may be it has merit. I don't know how the open-minded should view it as mine is closed. But IMO he was being questioned about election fraud and was asked if anyone had contact with the Russians, so he most likely posed his answer accordingly. It might not have occurred to him that he spoke with Russia about something totally off topic while serving in a totally separate capacity.

But a "gotcha" has been successful as he has recused himself, because..........