07-28-2015, 02:16 PM
(07-28-2015, 02:10 PM)fredtoast Wrote: You just keep huffing and puffing without ever addressing that fact that our argument is based on a logical fallacy.
The fact is that it is a benefit for the poor to have fewer children. It doesn't matter if that argument was used by people supporting eugenics, it is still a valid argument.
And my proof is that you do not even try to make any argument against it. It is a fact that it is a benefit for poor people to have fewer children.
I need to defend that the poor shouldn't be told that they should have as few children as possible?
Who are you to decide that for them?
