03-10-2017, 03:49 PM
(03-10-2017, 03:42 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Ah, So you agreed with the principle, just had an issue with the semantics. You're also leaving out peaceably in your points.
WTS, this will go nowhere. You think it is legal to have an assembly whose purpose is to stop someone else for peaceably assembling; I think you are not allowed to do this. Perhaps it will go to SCOTUS or at least SCOPNR.
No.