03-13-2017, 01:16 AM
(03-12-2017, 11:40 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Yeah, I remember that Willie was a washed up cripple who never played another snap after that season, and Stacey Andrews played well enough to get a 6 year $40 million (in '09 dollars) contract in free agency. Which do you think they should have kept?
Willie started 11 games for the Ravens that year, and they begged him not to retire in 2009. Washed up cripple is more than a bit harsh, and there's no way of knowing whether or not Willie would've retired had he remained a Bengal.
If the Bengals thought so highly of Andrews, why didn't they keep him?
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
