03-15-2017, 05:56 PM
(03-15-2017, 04:45 PM)Okeana Wrote: lol here we go again. Why not highlight everything ? or only just the facts that support your theory. This thread keeps me laughing every day.
" Drafting Mixon in the 2nd round is morally wrong, but if he's available in the third lets get him "
" I know the packers said they think he would be gone before they had a shot to get him, but I think their talking about the 2nd round because that sounds more logical because I want to spend a 2nd round pick not a first on the guy "
LMAO
You're the one that provided the link supporting your "rising stock" theory. I just pointed out that he is not really on the rise and that he's not viewed as a consensus 1st or 2nd rounder.
That being said, I fully want to draft him in the 2nd round. He would help the offense considerably.
