03-16-2017, 04:38 PM
(03-16-2017, 04:11 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: Wouldn't logic dictate that if a repeated approach isn't yielding the desired end result, that the approach should be re-examined and altered at some point?
Yes. But "re-examined" should not mean "accept message board myth that is not supported by fact".
I'll give you a perfect example. People here constantly cry about how the Bengals lose so many games because Marvin is too conservative. But when I ask for examples of games we have lost because Marvin is too conservative the response I often get is "0-7" or "0-13" instead of an actual list of games we lost because he was too conservative. I post statistics about where the Bengals rank as far as "throwing the ball with a lead in the second half". I post examples of the Bengals and other teams losing games because they were so aggressive. I post stats from games where Bill Belichick ran the ball consistently with a lead in the second half. But none of this matters. I guarantee that there will still be lots of postrs this year about how Marvin loses a bunch of games because he is too conservative and how he should be more like Belichick who never takes his foot off the gas.
So I am glad to "re-examine" any approach. All I ask is that people use some sort of logical argument to support their position.