03-19-2017, 09:11 PM
(03-19-2017, 10:59 AM)Shake n Blake Wrote: Acknowledge what they're saying. How many of these "64 DE's" are 3-4 DE's?
Where does MJ rank strictly among 4-3 DE's?
(03-19-2017, 12:15 PM)SHRacerX Wrote: Hello Kettle, you're black!
You might not have made up the rankings, but you infer it is among "all DEs" which have vastly different responsibilities. If you think MJ is one of the better 4-3 DEs, you do the rankings to prove it. Because virtually everyone else sees him as well below average.
Again, nice guy, not an impact player at a key position on the defense.
(03-19-2017, 12:17 PM)SHRacerX Wrote: How many play in 4-3s and how many play in 3-4s? Vastly different positions, resposibilities, etc. What is your ranking based on? Do you know? If it is among all DEs from both types of defenses, then it is useless.
(03-19-2017, 12:19 PM)SHRacerX Wrote: Pot still calling kettle a racist term. And I am glad no one cares...including you that seems to read every post and retort with some flimsy argument where you can't even cite the position groups you are ranking.
Lots of squealing.
Not one post with a single stat in it.
Why don't I just claim that MJ is nactually ranked higher among 4-3 DEs if you remove all of the 3-4 DEs? That is what all of you are doing. just making stuff up and claiming iot is true without anything at all to back it up.
I do my research with the tools I have. 4-3 DEs and 3-4 DEs are all listed as DEs. If you are going to claim it makes a difference how MJ is ranked then show me the numbers that prove it.
