Chicago: 12 hours, 1 neighborhood, 7 murders

[*bfine32*]

(03-31-2017, 08:49 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: Show me any state that says they lose their liberty against unreasonable searches once they have completed serving their time. After all, that is the right we are talking about being violated in stop-and-frisk situations.

Perhaps being a former felon increases the rule of Reasonable Suspicion and therefore a stop that may be deemed to not fulfill the reasonable suspicion rule by a non-known felon may be reasonable if the person is known to have participated in the activity in the past.

A convicted felon may not lose his or her protection from unreasonable search; however, their likelihood of committing such a crime may lower the reasonable suspension rule.

Stop and frisk and unreasonable search are not the same and SCOTUS has ruled as such.