04-09-2017, 10:38 AM
No problem.
I can understand that view.
The Mass Convention speech was mostly an attempt to get more Libertarians to be moderate.
So many of them become vicious fact-spewing machines and are quite likely on the autistic spectrum.
That's not an insult (to either group), just an observation that maybe Pat can validate.
Those folks make up probably around 40% of the people I've encountered and they are the equivalent of the Evangelicals, in the idea of the strict adherence to their agenda and desire for an aggressive leader.
Another 20% were "Huhha..weed, dude, weeeeed...".
That's not the only part of the platform they support, but they gravitate towards the advocates that highlight that particular issue.
So, that's knocks quite a bit from his "following".
I know his methods are nowhere near complex, but I think his approach is necessary to bring people into having conversations, instead of heated debate.
I appreciate your criticisms and I will go back to re-watch the videos with them in mind.
Oh, and again.... I'm not for fully eliminating the government.
That IS naive.
We need oversight and control of infrastructure.
I just desire the minimal amount to accomplish that.
I can understand that view.
The Mass Convention speech was mostly an attempt to get more Libertarians to be moderate.
So many of them become vicious fact-spewing machines and are quite likely on the autistic spectrum.
That's not an insult (to either group), just an observation that maybe Pat can validate.
Those folks make up probably around 40% of the people I've encountered and they are the equivalent of the Evangelicals, in the idea of the strict adherence to their agenda and desire for an aggressive leader.
Another 20% were "Huhha..weed, dude, weeeeed...".
That's not the only part of the platform they support, but they gravitate towards the advocates that highlight that particular issue.
So, that's knocks quite a bit from his "following".
I know his methods are nowhere near complex, but I think his approach is necessary to bring people into having conversations, instead of heated debate.
I appreciate your criticisms and I will go back to re-watch the videos with them in mind.
Oh, and again.... I'm not for fully eliminating the government.
That IS naive.
We need oversight and control of infrastructure.
I just desire the minimal amount to accomplish that.
