Even with signing minter, you take foster

[*Nate (formerly eliminate08)*]

(04-09-2017, 06:36 PM)TKUHL Wrote: Lol you guys are nuts with this Reddick talk. Nobody...and I mean nobody would have considered Reddick at 9 when the season was over. This guy was a 3rd round pick before the combine at best. Every year a handful of guys get way over drafted because of their combine numbers rather than their play. Reddick would be the worse pick possible at 9.

I usually agree with you but you are nutz here Tkuhl.

Reddick is way more athletic than Foster, can rush the passer, is bigger, is a good tackler and has been tested as
the best Defensive player on his team. If i take an Alabama player i take the best, Johnathan Allen.

Reddick has great athleticism and can cover. He is not a dip shit either like Foster was at the combine.

To say getting the most athletic, pass rushing, coverage Linebacker at 9 is the worse pick possible is insane.