Case for Eifert to be TE2 + draft OJ Howard

[*ochocincos*]

(04-19-2017, 11:50 AM)Essex Johnson Wrote: First, I totally disagree on Barnett.. he is an impact edge rusher in same mind set as Howard is an impact catching tight end.. both are not perfect (Howard not a very good blocker from what I have read, Barnett not great against the run).  I just feel with age of MJ, lack of production the last few years at DE and the young talent we seem to have at TE and still having Eifert now on the team, i think organization will prefer the edge rusher over TE.  

http://www.nfl.com/draft/2017/profiles/o.j.-howard?id=2557856

You might not be reading enough then...
https://www.profootballfocus.com/draft-pff-scouting-report-o-j-howard-te-alabama/

• Graded positively as a run-blocker each season since 2014, had highest run-blocking grade among all tight ends in 2016.
• Looks to finish blocks, very tough for smaller defenders to shed once engaged. Makes sure play is past him before letting up.Very effective on frontside of outside zone runs.
• Quick enough out of the snap to execute reach blocks, works well off combos and is effective moving up into the second level. Earned 11 positive grades this season while blocking on outside zone versus zero negative grades.
• Doesn’t just blindly dive on cut blocks. Appears to consciously seek out the defenders legs, will take an extra step on his lunge if need be.
• Great downfield lead blocker. Takes good angles, athletic enough to stay in front of the run and bullies smaller defensive backs.
  

http://dawgpounddaily.com/2017/03/06/cleveland-browns-o-j-howard-impresses-at-combine/

Quote:The following video is technically a Myles Garrett scouting video, but it can also be viewed as an O.J. Howard blocking highlight reel as Garrett did not fare so well against Howard. Look for Howard on each play and you will see why.

Video in which the quote in the above article is referring - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8qmOAe_QK0

Also, why do you disagree about Barnett? Just because he produced in college doesn't mean he would produce in the NFL. A majority of analysts have expressed concern he doesn't have elite traits to be a top-notch DE. It's supported via a sub-par showing in both the Combine and Pro Day.
And you mention he's not good against the run, but he actually is, and that's why he's considered higher.
https://www.profootballfocus.com/draft-pff-scouting-report-derek-barnett-edge-tennessee/

• Plays with good pad level in the run game, allowing him to shoot gaps, disrupt runs and break free on twists and stunts
• Wins on first contact more often than not in the run game, jarring blockers backward
• Can overpower tight ends when lined up at head up (6-tech), can be dominant run defender in that role
  

The concern with Barnett is much more in the area to be a double-digit sack master. In fact, I think he'll end up being a 6-8 sacks-a-year guy and good run defender. But I think that same quality DE can be found in Round 2. A complete TE like Howard cannot.