Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Dan Hoard has Lapham's pick at 9!
#53
(04-26-2017, 05:13 PM)TKUHL Wrote: Nate I think I've agreed with you on most of the prospects but IMO I have to disagree on this one. Yes I do think it's a waste with the other options that may be available at 9. This guy is injury prone undersized receiver who won't last in our division. He still needs to be developed as a short to medium route runner which I agree is what we need. I just think there will be better options at 9. If they want a pass catching weapon at 9 i would much rather have OJ or even a RB. Not to mention WR is not even close to our biggest needs. If we trade back and get him fine. And I'm sure this all depends on how the rest of our draft pans out. I want one of the top 5 RB's in the 2nd, this pretty much guarantees that won't happen now unless we do trade back/AJM or they just neglect DE in the first 2 rounds.

Just blew my mind on you saying it would be such a wasted pick. You are one of the posters i really respect.

The injuries to his knees didn't stop him from running the best forty effortlessly. This guy is something we have needed
for years and he is way faster than MLJ and is a better route runner. He sets his guys up. I understand the need for RB
and i am fine with Cook or McCaffrey at 9 but this guy will be deadly dude barring injuries.

Fits perfect for us IMHO, nice follow up post though TKUHL. Apologize if i came of like a dick.

We won't know who will be there in the 3rd at RB, plus we don't even know for sure about a AJM trade...

We definately need an End and a RB more than a WR i completely agree, but this guy is once in a lifetime type IMHO.

Love John Ross, i think he would help us immediately.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Dan Hoard has Lapham's pick at 9! - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 04-26-2017, 10:36 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)