Trump says he may break up 9th Circuit Court after rulings go against him

[GMDino]

(04-27-2017, 10:40 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: These recent rules raise interesting points though.  The Dems are clearly judge shopping when they file their motions against Trump's EO's in the 9th circuit.  IIRC on the first immigration order a federal judge on the east coast upheld the EO, citing well established precedent.  If two judges are giving completely divergent rulings on the same subject then something is very wrong.

And if one disagrees with a multitude of the others?

(04-27-2017, 10:40 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote:  Perhaps the best response to this would be a judicial panel that examines rulings that are overturned by Scotus or state supreme courts for diverging wildly from precedence or even being poorly made.  Maybe a three strike and the judge is out type rule.  That might curb the partisan leanings of all but the worst offenders.

You're saying a special panel to look at judgements YOU disagree with? Color me stunned.

Would you like to hand pick the "special panel"?