Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Hills "accepts responsibility" for loss
#63
(05-04-2017, 03:54 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: What you want is not what we have as far as political parties are concerned. Party membership is limited to the people that work for the party and those elected officials under their banner. The political insiders. The people aren't members of the party. The party isn't there to serve the people and it isn't there to push policy. Political parties in this country are set up to fundraise and win elections. Candidates don't have to hold to the party platform, the hierarchical structure within the party itself doesn't mean shit to the elected officials.

The DNC and the RNC are both private organizations that don't owe shit to the people. I don't like this fact, many people don't like this fact (and many don't realize it), but that is the fact. They could, in all seriousness, change their rules to make it where the committee itself selects their candidate and there isn't boo anyone could say about it.

Question 1: Why did they fire (aka she resigned) Debbie Wasserman Schultz?

Question 2; Do you feel they rigged the DNC Nomination?
[Image: bfine-guns2.png]

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]





Messages In This Thread
RE: Hills "accepts responsibility" for loss - bfine32 - 05-04-2017, 04:17 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)