05-04-2017, 04:59 PM
(05-04-2017, 04:12 PM)masterpanthera_t Wrote: The point isn't to question whether he is interested or not. It's simply to point out that not being interested in something in which your role implies you be interested, makes it a valid question in the OP. It's not that I believe he isn't interested, but not being interested is not a defense of any of his statements related to the OP. If your statement was not meant to provide a counterpoint to the post you responded to, it seems out of place. Perhaps you were agreeing with the point, and added a supplemental point? I wonder if that's the case based on your second line in the quote above. I.e. you don't trust Trump because he's not being accountable to statements he made, but hope that he will benefit the country, even though he hasn't stood by his word (at least in this case) so far.
The accusation here is that Trump "doesn't stand by anything". My comment about him not being interested was to point out why he responded the way he did wben he said he "doesn't stand by anything". I believe he misspoke and didn't actually mean it in the way people are perceiving it. He was in a haste to avoid the discussion and got defensive spouting out "I don't stand by anything" as a response.
I feel that is a valid defense for what he said because what he said was said in a hasty uninterested fashion.
