Hills "accepts responsibility" for loss

[Belsnickel]

(05-04-2017, 06:24 PM)bfine32 Wrote: 1) Then reason I asked the question was it seemed you were asserting that the DNC doesn't have to answer to anyone. It seems that they answered to the public by dismissing a chairman once she was exposed as not playing fair

There is always some form of accountability. For private organizations, whether it be a business selling widgets or a political party, the accountability is market based. If you sell crappy widgets, the market is going to react. The widgets for a political party are the candidates they put forth. Oftentimes, when a business is caught with doing something bad there is a sacrificial lamb at the executive level, even though everyone at the executive level is usually just as dirty. You sacrifice the lamb to the customers/shareholders/constituents and it serves to calm the waters.

That's what this was. They didn't have to, but it was the smart decision.