05-05-2017, 10:17 PM
(05-05-2017, 09:17 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Pick a topic. Immigration. Healthcare. Syria. Presidential authority to use force without Congressional approval. NATO. China. NAFTA. Generals. The US intelligence community. Trade. Abortion. Gay marriage. His political party. Nuclear stockpiles. How to defeat ISIS. Russia.
Sure. Immigration.
Quote:I did. Then I responded to your comment.
But your response made no sense in relation to the discussion.
Quote:Oh, so he just talks about getting things done?
You're trying to argue about something I wasn't arguing about.
Quote:How do you perceive, "I don't stand by anything."
As Trump avoiding the discussion. It was a statement without literal meaning.
Quote:I implied Trump doesn't stand by anything he He said, "I don't stand by anything." As evidenced by his contradictory positions and beliefs since the 1980s.
How many contradictions does one have to make to be considered not credible? And how many non-contradicting statements does one have to make to nullify the contradicting ones to be considered credible again?
Quote:Just check his contradictory stances on abortion over the years.
Contradicting in what ways?
Quote:Is pointing out he brought this shit on himself supposed to refute something?
Well, I said "This is a case of damned if he does, damned if he doesn't".
To which you responded, "No, this is a case of He brought this all on Himself"
That is a statement of refutation.
Quote:If a mechanic quoted you a price to fix your vehicle would you hire him if he told you, "I don't stand by anything."
That is a really silly question.
