GI Bill benefits legislation

[GMDino]

(05-10-2017, 12:03 PM)michaelsean Wrote: It's collecting 3%, not exactly "not paying for them".  It's not for a person's entire career, and it helps expand coverage.  Now I don't know if it's a good idea or not, but could we drop the knee jerk reactions. and maybe just discuss an issue.

I am discussing the issue.  People volunteer to fight for the country and guys in ties profess their love for the troops....unless the troops want paid, or benefits or anything they were promised for the service.

Pisses me off.

Even if it was .001%.

Edit: And when the defense budget is the majority of what we spend in this country anyway I see zero need for a soldier to have to pay anything.

Maybe that's just me.