05-10-2017, 02:45 PM
I don't think they should, but I don't see an issue with it. Just a matter of policy disagreement and not a snub towards the military.
I pay into my pension as a government employed teacher. It's a similar concept and it's a pretty cheap investment into an awesome set of benefits. If you're making it only affect future enlistees, they're not blindsided.
Then again, they deserve it. We shouldn't bicker over providing services for the military members when we're ok with paying hundreds of billions for other military related expenses.
I pay into my pension as a government employed teacher. It's a similar concept and it's a pretty cheap investment into an awesome set of benefits. If you're making it only affect future enlistees, they're not blindsided.
Then again, they deserve it. We shouldn't bicker over providing services for the military members when we're ok with paying hundreds of billions for other military related expenses.
![[Image: ulVdgX6.jpg]](http://i.imgur.com/ulVdgX6.jpg)
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)