05-11-2017, 05:12 PM
(05-11-2017, 05:01 PM)Matt_Crimson Wrote: I did read (listen to) what you said. Problem is, what you said sounded like a contradiction in regards to what you said in the other thread, therefore I pointed it out to note the inconsistency in your argument and provided you to challenge me on that.
You of course did and brought up "warranted suspicion". But suspicion that is warranted requires some sort of evidence for why you're suspicious, that's what makes it "warranted" in the first place.
You cherry picked a post from this thread and took it literally then acted as if it was a continuation from the debate in the last thread. One post had nothing to do with the other.
