05-11-2017, 05:26 PM
(05-11-2017, 05:23 PM)Matt_Crimson Wrote: The point is you're being biased as bfine has already noted.
You said "Investigation comes before evidence" in regards to the Trump/Russia story. Now you turn around and say (in my own words) "Trump doesn't have evidence of voter fraud so why should there be an investigation".
If you don't see whats wrong with that, then I don't know what to tell you.
No wonder you have trouble understanding things when you can't understand that context is key to the information in front of you.
Keep patting yourself on the back though.
