Vontaze Burfict!

[*rfaulk34*]

(05-24-2017, 08:27 AM)SHRacerX Wrote: I completely get it.  You don't have to explain it to me.  This discussion started because you threw out Marv's playoff record as a reason to not have optimism about the upcoming season.  It is a valid argument.  I countered with his overall record compared to what he inherited.  

I just don't think getting rid of Marv at this point would make sense.  Now, if he fails with THIS roster, then I think it is time to go younger.  That being said, I think everything will come together and once the proverbial playoff monkey is exercised, they run all the way to the Super Bowl and win....over the Saints.  Don't ask me why I think the Saints...i have no idea why.  

But here's the caveat, for those that choose to be optimistic at the beginning of each year. What if there's a, or a few, 'significant injuries' ala Dalton two years ago or other guys in the past? 

I ask because you said you don't think getting rid of Marv at this point would make sense. As i pointed out before, there have been 14 seasons without a playoff win. A lot of those explained away for one reason or another. 

This question isn't to antagonize or prolong a negative narrative, just to try and find out when enough is enough; where the line is drawn. And i ask because a few times in the recent past, people have said "if he can't get it done with this roster...". 

My personal opinion is, people just don't generally like change and there's the worry that if a change is made, it's automatically going to revert to the lost decade times.