Bombs go off in Manchester.

[Au165]

(05-24-2017, 02:27 PM)Millhouse Wrote: British investigators believe he was part of a network, or at least became a bomber of one. Travelling to Libya a month ago, which is now a hot bed of terrorist camps, doesnt look like coincidence. A ban on Libya, or at the least extra vetting is perfectly fine by me. And that bomb he used looked to be something made by someone that knew what they were doing, not a simple internet bomb. 

Of course this is still early in the investigation as more will come out in the next few days and weeks. But that is what has been reported so far by the Brits.

Not sure what he did there (one theory is visiting family members knowing he was going to die ), but the question is could he have done it without going there? The answer is probably yes. If going to Libya were to get you flagged in the future, would they just meet in another country not flagged? Maybe. As for the bomb itself, he didn't bring the bomb from Libya which means he was able to get supplies and make it in Britain. According to reports the dark web has things like very advanced bomb blueprints and such.

I get that, by I stand by closing of people from coming in doesn't change the fact radicalization of nationals already in the target areas is going to be the easiest and best way to continue attacking countries. No ban can keep out what is already in. The ban to me is a strawman. While it looks like an attempt to do something it doesn't really stop anything.