Adieu Accord de Paris

[GMDino]

(06-01-2017, 09:44 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: So he may have embellished a bit on the uranium part?  Meh, writers do that.  However, have you seen the list of excuses that Hillary makes for not winning the election?  Those poor Macendonian content farmers...  Can't make that up, straight from the loser's mouth...

So your support for the contention that Clinton was on the take admits he "embellished" (lied) about her role but "eh, writers do that"?

Quote:Schweizer has been criticized for incorrect reporting and conclusions not supported by facts, including in his second book "Friendly Spies". Two Sunday Times (UK) reporters trying to confirm his reporting discovered that alleged facts did not check out and that named sources did not exist or could not be found.[23][24][25] Schweizer admitted he overreached in attacking Hillary Clinton's purported role in approving a Russian uranium deal and falsely claimed that then-Secretary of State Clinton "had veto power" to stop the Russian State Atomic Nuclear Agency (Rosatom) from purchasing Uranium One. Schweizer had suggested Clinton approved the deal as a favor for Clinton Foundation donors.[26]

[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Schweizer#cite_note-26][/url]
But if want to switch and talk about the election aftermath instead I guess that's cool too.