Comey's opening statement is out.

[*michaelsean*]

(06-09-2017, 11:18 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: So, I'm not sitting here and saying that Trump is guilty of obstruction, I am merely discussing a hypothetical situation. So before anyone's knickers get in a twist, I just want to put that out there.

Yes, the POTUS has the discretion to direct investigations. But, this does not mean that the POTUS is exempt from the idea of obstruction of justice in doing so. Were a POTUS to have an investigation ended, or even impede one in any way, and Congress felt something was off about it, they could bring proceedings forward for impeachment based on obstruction of justice. The idea of justice being served is above the office of the POTUS, so if Congress feels that the POTUS obstructed justice with their actions, even if they are powers of the executive, then Congress can rightfully impeach on those grounds.

I know this isn't the greatest comparison, but we grant police powers to officers. If they use their authority incorrectly then there is a check to that process. They may be allowed to do something in a broad sense, but abuse of that power is still illegal and there are mechanisms in place to handle that situation. Those mechanisms exist all the way through our government, from the part-time greeter at your local town office all the way to Congress, POTUS, and SCOTUS. They have broad authority, but if it is abused it can still be deemed illegal by another branch and they can be punished for it.

Well yeah Congress can decide anything they want with enough votes. There is no court of appeals. If they decide he obstructed justice, even if he doesn't meet the legal requirements, they can impeach and oust him.  The protection being the high number of votes needed for removal.