Travel ban in effect; Supreme Court to decide

[BmorePat87]

(06-26-2017, 04:44 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: So since it was 9-0 in favor maybe it's time we look at some of these lower court judges and look to impeach these people who clearly jump the shark on the constitution.   It's been a joke.

Given that the Supreme Court only reviews 0.1% of all cases heard by the Federal Court of Appeals, and far lower for just Federal District Courts, you're suggesting that we grade judges on the 1 out of 1000 of their cases that a clerk decides to forward to one of the Justices for consideration. 

Even then, an average of 70% of the cases are overturned, likely because those cases that actually get heard are controversial or partisan in nature. 

So are we going to scrutinize only those significantly above the average, maybe 90%, using a small sampling? Are we also going to suggest that having the scope of your injunction limited somehow amounts to "jumping the shark"?