06-27-2017, 02:03 AM
(06-26-2017, 10:28 AM)Dill Wrote: An honest opinion without beating around the Bush?
No, "leftist media" and Democrats would not be trying to take Hillary down on charges she colluded with the Russians--unless there were evidence she colluded with the Russians to lose. According to the intel we have now, The Russians were working for a Trump win. And it was Trump's people, not Hillary's who forgot or hid all their meetings with Russian operatives. So what would be the evidential foundation for "taking down" Hillary? Why would "leftists" want to investigate Hillary for Trump campaign connections to Moscow?
If Hillary had won, we would have an executive set to further punish the Russians for interfering in the election. Now we have one who denies Russian responsibility, and appears set on protecting Russian interests.
Regarding the "good to know information" which I omitted because it was old news, the article suggests that Obama's interventions, among them a direct warning call to Putin, limited or stopped the hacking of state elections.
Trump has been working to undo Obama sanctions and proposed recalling the Russian operatives Obama expelled. Perhaps the idea came to him as he was giving away state secrets to the Russian Ambassador, whom he invited into the Oval Office without a heads up to the US press--along with an undercover TASS journalist.
And you, obviously, are liking all this very much.
Oh Ok, makes sense, double standards and hypocrisy typical of democrats.
Btw...how the hell do you find the time to reply to everyone that replies to you?
I realize half your stuff comes right out of Wikipedia but still.
