Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Travel ban in effect; Supreme Court to decide
#87
(06-28-2017, 01:11 AM)hollodero Wrote: So on what grounds did the 400.000 people get slaughtered? And why are the reasons for said slaughter no reason to call escaping people "refugees"? You do know that religion might be a reason for that slaughter, or political views, or speaking your mind, or just that you're in the wrong clan, lived in the wrong area, belong to the wrong ethnicity? You do have an idea what goes on in Syria, what a civil war is, don't you?
And they see a golden ticket, you say? You think they are happy that their home gets devastated, their friends and families murdered? Because now they can ive in an asylum seekers hostel with no perspective in a hostile environment of a strange culture? 
Hooray?

Your post is astonishingly unempathic. I can get why one might be opposed to taking in muslim refugees. But that is over the top scornful.

They are displaced persons. And I do feel bad for their homes being destroyed but that's a Syrian problem and as Syrians they can rebuild. Non of this requires taking any of them into our country. We can send them some resources, but outside of that.... it's on them.





Messages In This Thread
RE: Travel ban in effect; Supreme Court to decide - StLucieBengal - 06-28-2017, 01:18 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)