How Counter-Narratives Emerge

[GMDino]

(07-13-2017, 01:38 PM)Vlad Wrote: And who "thoroughly debunked"  the Clinton/Russian Uranium deal?  Snopes?

You know as well as I do that had it been Trump cutting a Uranium deal with Russia, the scrutiny from the left would be harsh an unrelenting....as from the Republican establishment as well.

 

Everyone.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/10/26/the-facts-behind-trumps-repeated-claim-about-hillary-clintons-role-in-the-russian-uranium-deal/?utm_term=.5d14828b79f0

http://www.cnbc.com/2017/02/16/trump-claims--falsely--that-clinton-gave-russia-20-of-us-uranium.html

http://www.factcheck.org/2016/10/a-false-corruption-claim/

At least everyone who understands facts and how those groups work.

The easiest fallacy to disprove is that she "sold 20% of our Uranium".

Then it all falls apart from there.

To be fair though *IF* Trump had done such a deal it would have failed spectacularly and he would have blamed someone else.