07-20-2017, 05:19 PM
(07-20-2017, 05:12 PM)GMDino Wrote: He didn't have the gun though, did he? Thought I heard today that he got more time than the guy who did have the gun.
I admit though I was half listening at work so I might have confused that.
Otherwise I fully agree that this was just stupid on his part.
Sorry, should have been more specific, OJ's companion had the gun. However, in criminal law you're guilty of the actions of your accomplice so there is little legal distinction. Who had the gun certainly becomes important in sentencing, usually the primary actor gets a more severe sentence, but in terms of committing a crime who is actually carrying the gun is less important.
