Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
OJ Simpson
#10
(07-20-2017, 05:19 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Sorry, should have been more specific, OJ's companion had the gun.  However, in criminal law you're guilty of the actions of your accomplice so there is little legal distinction.  Who had the gun certainly becomes important in sentencing, usually the primary actor gets a more severe sentence, but in terms of committing a crime who is actually carrying the gun is less important.

Got it.  I kind of guessed that they would charge based A gun being there no matter who had it.  Thanks.
[Image: giphy.gif]
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.





Messages In This Thread
OJ Simpson - Nebuchadnezzar - 07-20-2017, 04:11 PM
RE: OJ Simpson - GMDino - 07-20-2017, 04:16 PM
RE: OJ Simpson - TheLeonardLeap - 07-20-2017, 04:38 PM
RE: OJ Simpson - michaelsean - 07-20-2017, 04:53 PM
RE: OJ Simpson - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 07-20-2017, 05:10 PM
RE: OJ Simpson - GMDino - 07-20-2017, 05:12 PM
RE: OJ Simpson - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 07-20-2017, 05:19 PM
RE: OJ Simpson - GMDino - 07-20-2017, 05:24 PM
RE: OJ Simpson - Matt_Crimson - 07-20-2017, 05:04 PM
RE: OJ Simpson - Nately120 - 07-20-2017, 06:24 PM
RE: OJ Simpson - Matt_Crimson - 07-20-2017, 06:37 PM
RE: OJ Simpson - Nately120 - 07-20-2017, 06:57 PM
RE: OJ Simpson - Matt_Crimson - 07-21-2017, 01:53 AM
RE: OJ Simpson - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 07-20-2017, 05:21 PM
RE: OJ Simpson - Millhouse - 07-20-2017, 07:03 PM
RE: OJ Simpson - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 07-20-2017, 07:32 PM
RE: OJ Simpson - Vlad - 07-20-2017, 10:41 PM
RE: OJ Simpson - Vlad - 07-20-2017, 10:15 PM
RE: OJ Simpson - samhain - 07-20-2017, 10:53 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)