Proper Steps to MAGA?

[Belsnickel]

(07-22-2017, 12:05 AM)Vlad Wrote: I'm middle class and I'm benefiting from the surge in the market.

Do you realize how trivial your post is in relation to your own thread title? Even if all 4 of the situations you listed went your way, they together would have little or no impact toward MAGA.

You want some MAGA? I'll give you some MAGA.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/07/21/great-again-trump-eliminates-860-obama-era-federal-regulations/#


GREAT AGAIN: President Trump Eliminates 860 Obama-Era Federal Regulations



Michelle Moons/Breitbart News

by Jerome Hudson21 Jul 2017868
21 Jul, 2017 21 Jul, 2017
President Donald Trump’s White House has, according to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Mick Mulvaney, removed or withdrawn about 860 Obama administration-era federal regulations.
The massive decrease in regulations is part of the Trump administration’s overall deregulatory agenda, Mulvaney said during a press briefing Thursday.
Updating reporters on President Trump’s 2-for-1 policy for federal regulations — which requires cutting two regulations for every one new implemented regulation — Mulvaney said we are at 16-to-1, Breitbart News’s Michelle Moons reports.

Speaking to the “slow accretion, that slow cancer that can come from regulatory burdens that we put on our people,” the OMB director said during the “last six months here, the Obama Administration put on over six billion dollars in new regulatory burden,” adding, “We had zero.”
Mulvaney also unveiled a new economic plan for America called “MAGAnomics,” which, he said will tackle “tax reform, the regulatory accountability project (previously called the unified agenda), energy dominance, welfare reform, infrastructure, trade policies, trade, and spending restraint” in a way that will raise the economic growth rate to more than three percent.
The Trump administration’s plan, Mulvaney said, is to continue to cut and decrease Americans’ regulatory burden in the coming years as a means to spur economic growth.

Follow Jerome Hudson on Twitter @jeromeehudson.

But you see liberal bozos and the media are too fixated on trying to get rid of Trump to be concerned with all the wonderful things Trump is doing to MAGA.

I'm curious, how is this "making America great again?" See, in public policy we assess things base don outcomes, realized value. Cutting regulations is a policy decision. What regulations are those? What do they do? Then we need to ask what the greater, more far reaching effect of those regulations are. A regulation being cut may reduce pollution prevention requirements or worker safety requirements. What outcomes do those have? Companies may be able to invest more money and make more earnings, but there is also an effect of more hazards to employees and more damage to the environment.

So a policy decision, like cutting regulations, is not simply an example of making American great, again, because it's not providing any sort of explanation as to how. Are these regulations purely redundant regulations and cutting them only impact the number of sheets being printed off? Does cutting them do more harm than good? What did these regulations do? Answer those questions and then use this as an example.