07-29-2017, 11:34 AM
(07-28-2017, 10:48 PM)Vlad Wrote: About damn time.
And you remember that fake dossier containing dirt on Trump?...that's on the corrupt democrats and Russia.
https://gop.com/fusion-gps-ties-to-russia-exposed/
•Fusion GPS is the firm that hired ex-British spy Christopher Steele to put together a phony dossier during the 2016 campaign on supposed Trump ties to Russia.
•The dossier, full of Russian sourced information, was shopped to dozens of U.S. journalists during and immediately after the 2016 campaign, and eventually reported on despite obvious red flags to its accuracy.
•The dossier’s claims made it into the hands of U.S. intelligence officials, and were included in a top secret intelligence briefing for President Obama.
•The dossier's claims of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia helped spark the FBI investigation now supervised by Special Counsel Robert Mueller.
•We now know the dossier is full of bogus, false information. Christopher Steele even admitted in a lawsuit recently that most of his work in the dossier was never fully verified.
•Fusion GPS is deeply connected to Democrat politics. The co-founder of Fusion GPS is reportedly a Hillary Clinton donor. Fusion GPS allegedly was retained by Planned Parenthood, and did work for Democrats to investigate Mitt Romney in 2012.
[*]Fusion GPS has deep ties to Russia.
[*]According to the testimony of William Browder this morning, along with other reporting, Fusion GPS was hired by Russians to defend Russian government connected officials from allegations of fraud.
[*]Fusion GPS was also employed by Russians to fight against the Magnitsky Act and has worked on issues with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya.
[*]Browder spoke this morning about Fusion GPS’ tactics to work over reporters, and its efforts to run smear campaigns on behalf of their clients.
[*]It is troubling to hear about allegations that a Russian-backed opposition research firm, with a history of smearing individuals and pitching fake information to reporters, was then hired by opponents of President Trump and the information that was compiled was taken seriously by the highest levels of our intelligence community along with our media.
[url=https://gop.com/][/url]See video in link.
As this gets uncovered I can just hear the media and dems...."nothing to see here, no collusion, everyone go home, waste of time, we should be discussing real issues"...and the granddaddy of them all..."at this point what difference does it make".
I like how you completely omitted the part the Steele dossier was commissioned by a Trump Republican rival. Hillary's camp was approached with the information after the Republican primary. To quote Trump, who's not going to take that meeting? You want to have your cake and it it, too. But, if you're going to give Trump a pass for Jr. meeting with Russians as part of the "Russian government's" support of Trump then you also have to give Hillary a pass for meeting with a private sector company not working for the Russian government. Or, if you're going to condemn Hillary for taking a meeting to get dirt on Trump which didn't involve Russian officials then you have to also condemn Trump. So which is? Are you taking option 1) damned if you do or option 2) damned if you don't?
