Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
NFL.com - Bengals 14th in "triplet" rankings
#5
Makes no sense how Mixon is even ranked, or any rookie for that matter. So these rankings are irrelevant.

That said, I probably do agree that the Steelers have the best triplets. But I dont have Bell as the #1 back though due to his injuries and suspensions.

And if Mixon ends up being a top 5-10 back, and the o-line is halfway decent, our triplet will be up quite a bit higher this time next year, for the next irrelevant ranking that is.
“Don't give up. Don't ever give up.” - Jimmy V

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: NFL.com - Bengals 14th in "triplet" rankings - Millhouse - 08-02-2017, 06:51 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)