Rubio: Life begins at conception

[Brownshoe]

(08-08-2015, 11:05 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: But you have someone who is being denied their liberty by something (someone) against their wishes, and the government is stripping the person of their liberty by not permitting it to be ended. If they have not had an abortion then they have not committed a crime (in the theoretical world where abortion is a crime) so the government is stripping someone of their liberties that has not committed a crime.

If you escape a kidnapper and they are killed in the struggle, should you be tried for murder?


Nope. I think in the case of an abortion, if you believe the fetus/embryo has rights/is a person, then if an abortion happens, rights are violated. If an abortion is illegal, rights are being violated. Therefore, the decision should not be in the hands of the government because the government should never be in the position to put one person's unalienable rights above another person's.


See above. So we should be able to strip someone of their liberty though they have committed no crime? If they have not had an abortion int he world where abortions are illegal, then no crime is committed, yet their liberty is being stripped by the government as a result because they are now being forced to have something literally living off of them that they did not give permission for.

What are you even talking about? This is some top notch babble If I say so myself. The government is denying me my "liberty" to go on a mass murder spree, and you know what I agree with them being able to take that "liberty" away. You make a statement saying if someone escapes from a kidnapper and the kidnapper is killed in the process that makes no sense to me, because the kidnapper did something wrong by committing a crime, and the fetus did nothing and it's innocent.