If a North Korean nuclear attack happened

[Millhouse]

If they struck us first, then it isnt anyone's fault or a failure. It would be 100% on North Korea for using a nuclear warhead without being hit by one first. The only way to blame any president for it is to blame them for not going to war with North Korea to physically destroy their nuclear capabilities. And as we all know, there has never been a time since the Korean War when the people of the U.S. was in favor of going to war again with North Korea, especially these last 10-20 years.

But if it would happen, we would have to strike with tactical nukes to destroy them while keeping fallout to a minimum of not spreading to South Korea or Japan.

(08-07-2017, 01:45 PM)GMDino Wrote: What happens if they UNSUCCESSFULLY try?  Say it goes off somewhere over the ocean?

Even with that don't we (someone) have to respond in kind or at least as heavily as possible?

If they send one our way or an allies way, and it goes off prematurely, then that is not only an act of war, but an act of nuclear war. We would have to respond in kind imo, but not launch our tactical nukes at their cities. Aim for their military centers, bunkers, possible silos, etc. Hit their military with everything we can while trying to spare their civilians if possible.

I absolutely would hate to use nukes on them, but the cost of our guys & gals lives fighting a conventional war against them simply isnt worth it.