08-18-2017, 01:41 PM
(08-18-2017, 11:33 AM)Bengalzona Wrote: And clinical science should also tell you that following other board members from thread to thread to argue with them and pulling old posts of theirs is obsessive behavior.
If they are active in 82% of the first page threads and I'm active in only 41%, am I following them or is someone making another false claim?
Silly me using math and quotes as data to support my conclusions. Or in this case to dispel the false narrative I'm following someone who posts twice as much as me.
Which is more likely; I'm following Lucie around or there is an 82% chance I'm going to comment on a thread he is also commenting in? Statistically, there is less than a 1 in 5 chance I can comment in a thread he isn't commenting in. And if I were following him obsessively wouldn't I also be commenting in 82% of the front page threads? After all, I'm "obsessive" now although I'm ignoring half the shit he posts. As the numbers indicate, literally half.
