Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Your Opinions Of Willis and Smith
#18
(08-24-2017, 09:07 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Clarke was very efficient last year in limited duty; while Smith was terrible. It may take more than 2 Preseason games for Smith the leapfrog Clarke. 

Categorize Lawson as LB all you want, but we both know what he is going to be used for.

I get folks like Smith because he is new. Reminds me of that Steeler's castoff we fell in love with a couple years back.

WTS, I hope he makes the 53, but as I said: he's got an uphill battle. 

"Efficient" is a polite way of saying, he shouldn't be on the field much. 
He's already started to. He's gotten first team reps. 
He looks like he belongs. Clarke has proven he's not very good. He offers 0 pass rush. He's not particularly stout vs the run. 

Categorizing Lawson is important for the numbers game. Try to fudge it all you want for your argument, but he's listed as a LB on the website for a reason. 

When it comes to bottom roster guys, yeah try something new. Why is that so bad? 
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Your Opinions Of Willis and Smith - kevin - 08-24-2017, 07:09 PM
RE: Your Opinions Of Willis and Smith - RoyleRedlegs - 08-24-2017, 09:24 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)