Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Your Opinions Of Willis and Smith
#20
(08-24-2017, 09:24 PM)RoyleRedlegs Wrote: "Efficient" is a polite way of saying, he shouldn't be on the field much. 
He's already started to. He's gotten first team reps. 
He looks like he belongs. Clarke has proven he's not very good. He offers 0 pass rush. He's not particularly stout vs the run. 

Categorizing Lawson is important for the numbers game. Try to fudge it all you want for your argument, but he's listed as a LB on the website for a reason. 

When it comes to bottom roster guys, yeah try something new. Why is that so bad? 

Clarke had 4 sacks last year. That's 4-times as many as Smith. So why should Smith be on the field?

Not really "fudging" anything; just saying it's going to be difficult for him to make the 53. They classify Hardison as a DE; not sure I'd be "fudging" it to not consider him as such. 

Don't know how much slower I can type this. I hope he makes the squad, but he has an uphill battle. 
[Image: bfine-guns2.png]

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Your Opinions Of Willis and Smith - kevin - 08-24-2017, 07:09 PM
RE: Your Opinions Of Willis and Smith - bfine32 - 08-24-2017, 09:50 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)