Beauty and brains

[Belsnickel]

(08-27-2017, 10:15 AM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: You failed to mention that the racists were the original legally permitted protestors, only mentioning they came anticipating violence (which was also true).

You also specified the racists anticipating violence, and you specified that there were some counter protestors that were non-violent, but you failed to mention the existence of "counter protestors" who specifically showed up there for violence and nothing else.

A slanted, but otherwise fairly accurate assessment.

1. The counter-protesters also had permits. The permit statement is inane.

2. This is why I specified that there were counter-protesters that attacked them.