Beauty and brains

[*TheLeonardLeap*]

(08-27-2017, 10:19 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: 1. The counter-protesters also had permits. The permit statement is inane.

2. This is why I specified that there were counter-protesters that attacked them.

1. Yes, but you never mentioned the racists being the original protestors, just that they showed up anticipating violence, while the other group got the title of protestors in your summary.

2. Once again, you mentioned it after the racists anticipating violence and attacking non-violent protestors, and never mentioned that those counter-protestors also showed up armed, armored, and with the express intent of violence. Your way made it seem like the racists showed up, attacked peaceful protestors, so counter-protestors attacked the racists. In reality, it was more like racist protestors both attacked and were attacked by violent "counter-protestors"... and some peaceful counter-protestors got caught in the crossfire.

You can't have a battlefield with only one side, man. Look at some of those pictures and both sides are wearing helmets, carrying shields, eye protection, carrying sticks and such. It's two groups of almost exclusively shitheads, with a sprinkling of peaceful protestors caught in the middle.