Who should we add when Driskel goes on IR or cut/add?

[leonardfan40]

(09-05-2017, 03:46 PM)jj22 Wrote: It's not like teams don't do this. We are short , 2 safety's (Williams hurt, Fed needed to start), and cb (Dennard, Shaw needed to take majority of their snaps on D), we've lost our rb ace, sooooo who's taking his spot on teams, all these players no longer available for teams against Baltimore, all which would have been used primarily on teams. Special teams will pay the price. It's almost certain. We are about to see what happens when special teams ace's are needed to start, and can't play as many snaps on teams.

You guys aren't thinking big picture at all. So now we are able to dress all 4 dt's (when we usually only dress 3) Well that's great. Maybe Billings or Glasgow can be a gunner.....

Maybe now since we can activate all of our Guards. Maybe one can return some kicks for us. These are the players that will be active now that we have 52 man roster. This doesn't help special teams at all. C'mon guys.......

The Bengals will have enough non lineman to fill the 10 kick coverage spots. If they didn't they would bring someone in. Are you honestly telling me you think they will be running Glasgow or a guard out as our gunner? Lmao this site is full of drama queens

We have 3-4 LB's, then Shaw, Dennard, Jackson, Russell, Smith, along with several WR's and TE's capable of filling  all 10 spots on kick coverage if needed. If the team felt they needed someone they would sign them, if it makes it easier to understand just pretend Driskel is still on the roster this week, he would be inactive and we'd be in the exact same boat!