Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Who should we add when Driskel goes on IR or cut/add?
#66
(09-05-2017, 06:33 PM)NATI BENGALS Wrote: Crazy ppeople are defending this non move. 

In the NFL you are always supposed to be looking to get better. Always evaluating.

Any move is better than no move.

We could have brought in one of the 1100+ guys released and at least taken a look. 

We did nothing. Not even gonna try to see if there may be a decent player out there.

No, practical people are seeing this non-move as NOT a big deal.

Nobody is defending anything or praising it; it literally is just as important as the crap you took this morning (if you indeed did so). Looking to get better? How is any team going to get better if they sign a guy for literally 4 days worth of partial work, then sit him on Sunday, only to have him get cut on Monday when Adam comes back? Like drafting OL in the 6th round; why waste your time with **** when it is nothing more than ****? If you're looking to get better, retain your good guys or make a splash in FA, don't pick up trash just because, "you need it," its still trash and it will most-likely always be trash.

Your eyes are bigger than your stomach and the lack of practicality is showing; this is a completely MOOT non-move, period.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
[Image: Truck_1_0_1_.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Who should we add when Driskel goes on IR or cut/add? - Truck_1_0_1_ - 09-06-2017, 09:20 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)