Who should we add when Driskel goes on IR or cut/add?

[jj22]

(09-06-2017, 09:15 AM)Truck_1_0_1_ Wrote: **7** GUYS WILL BE INACTIVE. 6 NOW WITH ONLY 52 ON THE ROSTER. WHAT AREN"T YOU UNDERSTANDING ABOUT AN EXTRA PERSON NOT EVEN SUTING UP?!

Seriously, it doesn't compute in reality like you are thinking in your head. We're down 2 safeties? Dress a WR and have him play teams for the Ss. Or dress a CB. Or Carter, who wasn't going to be active in the first place.

7 guys will be inactive, now 6..... My point exactly. That 4th DT or 3rd guard won't help special teams. Act like you don't get my point all you want, but I'd rather have the 7 inactive including that typical 4th DT or extra Guard that we usually keep inactive, and have that extra roster spot on the 46 for someone (cb, rb, safety) that can help on special teams. Counting on players to play special teams who are needed to play majority of their snaps on defense for injured and suspended players isn't good.... So either our Defense is going to suffer (because starters are playing special teams), or our Special teams will suffer. But thankfully we'll have that extra DT or Guard (Carter was going to be active regardless due to our injuries to TE's) active right.....

But let's keep acting like teams go into the season with 52 man rosters all the time......

Bengals were being either cheap, or lazy. Either way those aren't championship qualities.