Catch that Wasn't a Catch

[*PhilHos*]

(09-15-2017, 04:26 PM)TKUHL Wrote: They ruled that he had control when it touched the ground. I thought it couldn't hit, but apparently if the receiver has control before it touches and the ground does not appear to aid in the catch, then it's a catch.

Yes if the ball touches but the player has clear control, it's still a catch. However, it looked to me as the ball moved after it touched the ground which I thought meant that it should be considered an incomplete catch.