09-20-2017, 02:30 PM
(09-20-2017, 02:26 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Actually, the word you're searching for is rhetorical, not inane.
It was both. They aren't mutually exclusive.
Quote:The question didn't require an answer because we both already knew the answer was yes.
Yes, the answer to your facile question is yes, for anyone.
Quote:The question demonstrated that people bother you even though they are who they are. The anti-Trumps are still the anti-Trumps and the have been the anti-Trumps since before Trump was elected so I don't understand why they bother you.
They don't bother me, they intrigue me. I wonder what it must be like to be upset about things like Trump's UN speech or Obama saying, "If I had a son he'd look like Trayvon".
Quote:Then explain why you can be bothered by the anti-Trumps, but others can't be bothered by Trump given they are who they are and they have been that way since before Trump was elected.
I just did.