POTUS UN Speech

[oncemoreuntothejimbreech]

(09-20-2017, 02:30 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: It was both.  They aren't mutually exclusive.



Yes, the answer to your facile question is yes, for anyone.



They don't bother me, they intrigue me.  I wonder what it must be like to be upset about things like Trump's UN speech or Obama saying, "If I had a son he'd look like Trayvon".



I just did.

So you complain repeatedly because you're intrigued, not bothered. Got it

Let me use another facile analogy. Trump bothers people because he is Trump, not because he isn't Trump. Take me for example, I don't like mustard. I don't want mustard on my hamburger. So it bothers me when a restaurant puts mustard on my hamburger after I ask for them to hold the mustard. I'm bothered because the mustard is mustard. Now if mustard was something other than mustard it might not bother me. Say, if mustard suddenly became something other than mustard like . . . um . . . ketchup, then it wouldn't bother me. Why? Because it's not ***** mustard. And mustard, not ketchup, bothers intrigues me. So you see there really isn't anything complicated about this. Rather, it's really quite simple. Although I appreciate the completely unnecessary vocabulary lesson. Unless you think whether or not you like or dislike mustard is a complicated subject. Do you think your opinion of mustard is complicated?